GPZ vs VOO
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GPZ | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $259M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 21 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -10.89% | +13.81% | |
| 1Y Return | -10.35% | +21.53% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.46% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.87% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
GPZ vs VOO Performance
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GPZ returned -10.35% while VOO returned +21.53%. Year to date, GPZ is down 10.89% versus a gain of 13.81% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GPZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.7% for GPZ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GPZ charges 0.40% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GPZ currently yields 0.98% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
GPZ and VOO share 4 holdings out of 521 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GPZ or VOO?
GPZ has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GPZ or VOO?
Over the past year GPZ returned -10.35% vs +21.53% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GPZ annualized -0.62% vs +13.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GPZ or VOO?
GPZ has been the more volatile fund at 24.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GPZ -31.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GPZ and VOO?
GPZ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GPZ and VOO?
GPZ and VOO share 4 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 521 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GPZ or VOO?
GPZ yields 0.98% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.