GPZ vs VTI
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GPZ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $267M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 25 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -10.42% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | -10.23% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
GPZ vs VTI Performance
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GPZ returned -10.23% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, GPZ is down 10.42% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GPZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.7% for GPZ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GPZ charges 0.40% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GPZ currently yields 0.98% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GPZ and VTI share 10 holdings out of 2797 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GPZ or VTI?
GPZ has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GPZ or VTI?
Over the past year GPZ returned -10.23% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GPZ annualized -0.20% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GPZ or VTI?
GPZ has been the more volatile fund at 24.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GPZ -31.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GPZ and VTI?
GPZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GPZ and VTI?
GPZ and VTI share 10 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2797 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GPZ or VTI?
GPZ yields 0.98% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.