GREK vs QQQ
Global X MSCI Greece ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. GREK delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GREK | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $330M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.44% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 35 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +24.44% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.03% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +35.52% | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +28.92% | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -81.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 7, 2011 | Mar 10, 1999 |
GREK vs QQQ Performance
Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GREK returned +31.03% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, GREK is up 24.44% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Over three years, GREK compounded at +35.52% per year against +25.75% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +28.92% and +14.78% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +5.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GREK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.4% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -81.7% for GREK and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GREK charges 0.56% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $18 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GREK currently yields 2.44% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
GREK and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 134 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GREK or QQQ?
GREK has an expense ratio of 0.56% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $38 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GREK or QQQ?
Over the past year GREK returned +31.03% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so GREK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), GREK annualized +5.57% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GREK or QQQ?
GREK has been the more volatile fund at 33.4% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: GREK -81.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both GREK and QQQ?
GREK and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GREK and QQQ?
GREK and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 134 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GREK or QQQ?
GREK yields 2.44% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so GREK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.