GREK vs VXUS
Global X MSCI Greece ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. GREK delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GREK | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $330M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.44% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 35 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +27.35% | +14.98% | |
| 1Y Return | +37.16% | +25.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +35.43% | +19.65% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +28.18% | +9.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -81.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 7, 2011 | Jan 26, 2011 |
GREK vs VXUS Performance
Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GREK returned +37.16% while VXUS returned +25.63%. Year to date, GREK is up 27.35% versus a gain of 14.98% for VXUS.
Over three years, GREK compounded at +35.43% per year against +19.65% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +28.18% and +9.30% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, GREK has the edge at +5.72% annualized vs +4.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GREK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.5% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -81.7% for GREK and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GREK charges 0.56% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $5 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GREK currently yields 2.44% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
GREK and VXUS share 9 holdings out of 7892 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GREK or VXUS?
GREK has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $51 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GREK or VXUS?
Over the past year GREK returned +37.16% vs +25.63% for VXUS, so GREK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), GREK annualized +5.72% vs +4.87% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GREK or VXUS?
GREK has been the more volatile fund at 33.5% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: GREK -81.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both GREK and VXUS?
GREK and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GREK and VXUS?
GREK and VXUS share 9 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7892 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GREK or VXUS?
GREK yields 2.44% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.