GREK vs VTI
Global X MSCI Greece ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GREK delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GREK | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $330M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.44% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 35 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +24.44% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.03% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +35.52% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +28.92% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -81.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 7, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
GREK vs VTI Performance
Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GREK returned +31.03% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, GREK is up 24.44% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, GREK compounded at +35.52% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +28.92% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +5.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GREK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -81.7% for GREK and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GREK charges 0.56% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $3 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GREK currently yields 2.44% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GREK and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2819 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GREK or VTI?
GREK has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $53 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GREK or VTI?
Over the past year GREK returned +31.03% vs +21.39% for VTI, so GREK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), GREK annualized +5.57% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GREK or VTI?
GREK has been the more volatile fund at 33.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GREK -81.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GREK and VTI?
GREK and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GREK and VTI?
GREK and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2819 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GREK or VTI?
GREK yields 2.44% while VTI yields 1.07%, so GREK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.