GRNI vs SCHD
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, GRNI or SCHD?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. GRNI is less concentrated, with 27.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GRNI | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $56M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.18% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 135 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +8.05% | +25.84%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +30.18% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.08% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.97% |
| Top 10 Weight | 27.3%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | Fundstrat Capital | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 17, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
GRNI vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GRNI vs SCHD Performance
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF (GRNI) is an ETF from Fundstrat Capital and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Year to date, GRNI is up 8.05% versus a gain of 25.84% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GRNI charges 0.99% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $6 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRNI currently yields 8.18% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
4.8% of GRNI's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 5.3% of SCHD's money is in holdings GRNI also owns.
SCHD and GRNI share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, GRNI as of Jun 30, 2026 and SCHD as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
2 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in GRNI and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 135 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 97 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for GRNI (94.6% of the fund), and 42 for GRNI that do not appear in SCHD (92.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GRNI and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GRNI or SCHD?
GRNI has an expense ratio of 0.99% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $93 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between GRNI and SCHD?
5.3% of SCHD's money is in holdings GRNI also owns. 5.3% of SCHD's is in holdings GRNI also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in GRNI and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, GRNI or SCHD?
GRNI yields 8.18% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so GRNI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than GRNI?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. GRNI is less concentrated, with 27.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.