GRNI vs QQQ

GRNI vs QQQ

Which is better, GRNI or QQQ?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. GRNI is less concentrated, with 27.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: GRNI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGRNIQQQ
Expense Ratio0.99%0.18%Best
AUM$56M$483.5B
Dividend Yield8.18%0.44%
Holdings135107
YTD Return+8.05%+15.18%Best
1Y Return-+19.65%
3Y Return (annualized)-+24.60%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.94%
Top 10 Weight27.3%Best46.5%
Fund FamilyFundstrat CapitalInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionNov 17, 2025Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

GRNI vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

GRNI vs QQQ Performance

Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF (GRNI) is an ETF from Fundstrat Capital and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, GRNI is up 8.05% versus a gain of 15.18% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GRNI charges 0.99% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $18 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRNI currently yields 8.18% against 0.44% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

GRNI already in QQQ33.9%
QQQ already in GRNI48.3%

33.9% of GRNI's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 48.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings GRNI also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

16 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in GRNI and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 135 and 107.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 80 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for GRNI (49.2% of the fund), and 28 for GRNI that do not appear in QQQ (63.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GRNIWeight in QQQDifference
NVDANvidia Corp2.14%8.44%6.30%
AAPLApple, Inc2.42%7.27%4.85%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp2.07%5.76%3.69%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc2.01%4.67%2.66%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc2.77%3.45%0.68%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.14%3.16%1.02%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A1.87%3.36%1.49%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.27%2.78%0.51%
TSLATesla Inc1.76%2.56%0.80%
KLACKla Corp2.75%1.11%1.64%

48.3% of QQQ is already inside GRNI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

GRNIQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GRNI or QQQ?

GRNI has an expense ratio of 0.99% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $81 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between GRNI and QQQ?

48.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings GRNI also owns. 48.3% of QQQ's is in holdings GRNI also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in GRNI and 102 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, GRNI or QQQ?

GRNI yields 8.18% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so GRNI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than GRNI?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. GRNI is less concentrated, with 27.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.