GSID vs IVV
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GSID or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. GSID is less concentrated, with 13.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GSID | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.39% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 908 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +9.50% | +11.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.25% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.11% | +20.71%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.20% | +12.80%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4%Tie | 15.4%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -29.9% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,830 | $18,262Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 13.4%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 12, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 15, 2020 to Sep 10, 2026 (6.3 years).
GSID vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.3 years both funds cover.
GSID vs IVV Performance
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GSID returned +16.25% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, GSID is up 9.50% versus a gain of 11.57% for IVV.
Over three years, GSID compounded at +17.11% per year against +20.71% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +8.20% and +12.80% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +18.11% annualized vs +13.78%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GSID and IVV have been equally volatile, both at 15.4% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.9% for GSID and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GSID charges 0.20% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GSID currently yields 2.39% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of GSID's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings GSID also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 876 positions we hold weights for in GSID and 505 in IVV, against full books of 908 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 495 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GSID (99.3% of the fund), and 4 for GSID that do not appear in IVV (0.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GSID | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| UMG:ASUniversal Music Group N.V. Universal Music Group N V | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GSID and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GSID or IVV?
GSID has an expense ratio of 0.20% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GSID or IVV?
Over the past year GSID returned +16.25% vs +17.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), GSID annualized +13.78% vs +18.11% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GSID or IVV?
GSID and IVV have been equally volatile, both at 15.4% annualized. Worst drawdown: GSID -29.9% vs IVV -24.5%.
Should I hold both GSID and IVV?
GSID and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GSID or IVV?
GSID yields 2.39% while IVV yields 1.06%, so GSID currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GSID?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. GSID is less concentrated, with 13.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.