GSID vs IVV
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. GSID offers more diversification with 908 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GSID | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.1B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.44% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 908 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +10.92% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.11% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.19% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.00% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 12, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
GSID vs IVV Performance
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GSID returned +18.11% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, GSID is up 10.92% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, GSID compounded at +18.19% per year against +21.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +9.00% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, GSID has the edge at +14.15% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GSID has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.9% for GSID and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GSID charges 0.20% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GSID currently yields 2.44% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GSID and IVV share 0 holdings out of 1381 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GSID or IVV?
GSID has an expense ratio of 0.20% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GSID or IVV?
Over the past year GSID returned +18.11% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), GSID annualized +14.15% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GSID or IVV?
GSID has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GSID -29.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GSID and IVV?
GSID and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GSID and IVV?
GSID and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1381 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GSID or IVV?
GSID yields 2.44% while IVV yields 1.10%, so GSID currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.