GSID vs VXUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, GSID or VXUS?
Nearly the same fund. VXUS costs less.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GSID | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.39% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 908 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +10.62% | +14.83%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.41% | +24.27%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.53% | +19.98%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.36% | +9.07%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4% | 14.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.9% | -29.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,940 | $15,436Best |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 12, 2020 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 15, 2020 to Sep 9, 2026 (6.3 years).
GSID vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.3 years both funds cover.
GSID vs VXUS Performance
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GSID returned +17.41% while VXUS returned +24.27%. Year to date, GSID is up 10.62% versus a gain of 14.83% for VXUS.
Over three years, GSID compounded at +17.53% per year against +19.98% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +8.36% and +9.07% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +14.37% annualized vs +13.97%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GSID has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 14.7% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.9% for GSID and -29.4% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GSID charges 0.20% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $5 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GSID currently yields 2.39% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 75.3% of GSID's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 87.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of GSID is already inside VXUS. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 48 days apart, GSID as of Aug 17, 2026 and VXUS as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
712 positions in common, counted across the 877 positions we hold weights for in GSID and 8,094 in VXUS, against full books of 908 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GSID | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSBA:LNHsbc Securities Inc | 1.54% | 0.72% | 0.82% |
| NOVN:SMNovartis Ag Ordinary Shares | 1.19% | 0.65% | 0.54% |
| NESN:SMNestle Sa | 1.07% | 0.59% | 0.48% |
| AZN:LNAstraZeneca PLC | 1.00% | 0.62% | 0.38% |
| SIE:SGSiemens Ag | 1.02% | 0.52% | 0.50% |
| SAN:MABanco Santander S.a. | 0.92% | 0.45% | 0.47% |
| CBA:AUCommonwealth Bank Of Australia | 0.84% | 0.42% | 0.42% |
| BHP:AUBHP Group Limited Ordinary Shares | 0.95% | 0.30% | 0.65% |
| SCHN:PASchneider Electric Se | 0.84% | 0.39% | 0.45% |
| 8035:JPTokyo Electron Limited | 0.72% | 0.47% | 0.25% |
75.3% of GSID is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GSID or VXUS?
GSID has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GSID or VXUS?
Over the past year GSID returned +17.41% vs +24.27% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), GSID annualized +13.97% vs +14.37% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GSID or VXUS?
GSID has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 14.7% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: GSID -29.9% vs VXUS -29.4%.
Should I hold both GSID and VXUS?
GSID and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GSID and VXUS?
At least 75.3% of GSID's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 712 positions in common, counted across the 877 positions we hold weights for in GSID and 8,094 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, GSID or VXUS?
GSID yields 2.39% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than GSID?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.