GSID vs QQQ

GSID vs QQQ

Which is better, GSID or QQQ?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. GSID is less concentrated, with 13.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQLess Concentrated: GSID

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGSIDQQQ
Expense Ratio0.20%0.18%Best
AUM$1.1B$483.5B
Dividend Yield2.39%0.44%
Holdings908107
YTD Return+10.67%+16.87%Best
1Y Return+16.22%+22.98%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+17.64%+24.98%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+8.28%+14.39%Best
Volatility (annualized)15.4%Best20.3%
Max Drawdown-29.9%Best-35.1%
$10,000 over 5 years$14,885$19,586Best
Top 10 Weight13.4%Best46.5%
Fund FamilyGoldman Sachs Asset ManagementInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMay 12, 2020Mar 10, 1999

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 15, 2020 to Sep 11, 2026 (6.3 years).

GSID vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.3 years both funds cover.

GSID vs QQQ Performance

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GSID returned +16.22% while QQQ returned +22.98%. Year to date, GSID is up 10.67% versus a gain of 16.87% for QQQ.

Over three years, GSID compounded at +17.64% per year against +24.98% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +8.28% and +14.39% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +20.82% annualized vs +13.96%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.3% compared with 15.4% for GSID. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.9% for GSID and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GSID charges 0.20% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $18 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GSID currently yields 2.39% against 0.44% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

GSID already in QQQ3.3%
QQQ already in GSID1.1%

3.3% of GSID's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 1.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings GSID also owns.

GSID and QQQ share little of their money.

3 positions in common, counted across the 876 positions we hold weights for in GSID and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 908 and 107.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 95 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for GSID (97.0% of the fund), and 4 for GSID that do not appear in QQQ (0.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GSIDWeight in QQQDifference
ASML:ASAsml Holding Adr Representing Nv3.06%0.68%2.38%
FER:ASFerrovial Se0.13%0.21%0.08%
CCEP:LNCoca-Cola Europacific Partne0.09%0.21%0.12%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GSID and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GSIDQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GSID or QQQ?

GSID has an expense ratio of 0.20% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, GSID or QQQ?

Over the past year GSID returned +16.22% vs +22.98% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), GSID annualized +13.96% vs +20.82% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GSID or QQQ?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.3% annualized versus 15.4% for GSID. Worst drawdown: GSID -29.9% vs QQQ -35.1%.

Should I hold both GSID and QQQ?

GSID and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between GSID and QQQ?

3.3% of GSID's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 1.1% of QQQ's is in holdings GSID also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 876 positions we hold weights for in GSID and 102 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, GSID or QQQ?

GSID yields 2.39% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so GSID currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than GSID?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. GSID is less concentrated, with 13.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.