GSID vs QQQ
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. GSID offers more diversification with 908 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GSID | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $1.1B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.44% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 908 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +11.95% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.65% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.63% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.99% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.9% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 12, 2020 | Mar 10, 1999 |
GSID vs QQQ Performance
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GSID returned +19.65% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, GSID is up 11.95% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, GSID compounded at +18.63% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +8.99% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, GSID has the edge at +14.31% annualized vs +13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 15.5% for GSID. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.9% for GSID and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GSID charges 0.20% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $18 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GSID currently yields 2.44% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
GSID and QQQ share 2 holdings out of 976 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GSID or QQQ?
GSID has an expense ratio of 0.20% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GSID or QQQ?
Over the past year GSID returned +19.65% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), GSID annualized +14.31% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GSID or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 15.5% for GSID. Worst drawdown: GSID -29.9% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both GSID and QQQ?
GSID and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GSID and QQQ?
GSID and QQQ share 2 common holdings with a 0.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 976 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GSID or QQQ?
GSID yields 2.44% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so GSID currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.