GSJY vs VOO
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. GSJY delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GSJY | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $89M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.05% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 157 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +17.42% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.98% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.12% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.89% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 2, 2016 | Sep 7, 2010 |
GSJY vs VOO Performance
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GSJY returned +25.98% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, GSJY is up 17.42% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, GSJY compounded at +20.12% per year against +22.06% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.89% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +8.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 13.2% for GSJY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.6% for GSJY and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GSJY charges 0.25% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GSJY currently yields 2.05% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
GSJY and VOO share 0 holdings out of 658 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GSJY or VOO?
GSJY has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GSJY or VOO?
Over the past year GSJY returned +25.98% vs +21.87% for VOO, so GSJY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), GSJY annualized +8.20% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GSJY or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 13.2% for GSJY. Worst drawdown: GSJY -32.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GSJY and VOO?
GSJY and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GSJY and VOO?
GSJY and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 658 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GSJY or VOO?
GSJY yields 2.05% while VOO yields 1.08%, so GSJY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.