GTR vs IVV
WisdomTree Target Range Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GTR | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $71M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.32% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 11 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +10.58% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +16.40% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.53% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 7, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
GTR vs IVV Performance
WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GTR returned +16.40% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, GTR is up 10.58% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Over three years, GTR compounded at +13.53% per year against +21.80% for IVV. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +5.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 9.9% for GTR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.4% for GTR and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GTR charges 0.70% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GTR currently yields 5.32% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GTR and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GTR or IVV?
GTR has an expense ratio of 0.70% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GTR or IVV?
Over the past year GTR returned +16.40% vs +22.02% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), GTR annualized +5.79% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GTR or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 9.9% for GTR. Worst drawdown: GTR -21.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GTR and IVV?
GTR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between GTR and IVV?
GTR and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GTR or IVV?
GTR yields 5.32% while IVV yields 1.09%, so GTR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.