GTR vs VTI

GTR vs VTI

Which is better, GTR or VTI?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGTRVTI
Expense Ratio0.70%0.03%Best
AUM$73M$666.9B
Dividend Yield5.31%1.03%
Holdings123,543
YTD Return+9.61%+12.30%Best
1Y Return+12.42%+16.08%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+13.54%+21.01%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+5.49%+12.36%Best
Volatility (annualized)9.8%Best15.9%
Max Drawdown-21.4%Best-25.4%
$10,000 over 5 years$13,063$17,908Best
Fund FamilyWisdomTree InvestmentsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 7, 2021May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 7, 2021 to Sep 18, 2026 (4.9 years).

GTR vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.9 years both funds cover.

GTR vs VTI Performance

WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GTR returned +12.42% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, GTR is up 9.61% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.

Over three years, GTR compounded at +13.54% per year against +21.01% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +5.49% and +12.36% respectively.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 9.8% for GTR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.4% for GTR and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GTR charges 0.70% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GTR currently yields 5.31% against 1.03% for VTI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GTR and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GTRVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GTR or VTI?

GTR has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, GTR or VTI?

Over the past year GTR returned +12.42% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GTR or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 9.8% for GTR. Worst drawdown: GTR -21.4% vs VTI -25.4%.

Should I hold both GTR and VTI?

GTR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, GTR or VTI?

GTR yields 5.31% while VTI yields 1.03%, so GTR currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than GTR?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.