GTR vs VOO
WisdomTree Target Range Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GTR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $71M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.32% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 11 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +10.02% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.91% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 7, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
GTR vs VOO Performance
WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GTR returned +17.91% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, GTR is up 10.02% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, GTR compounded at +13.37% per year against +21.47% for VOO. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +5.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 9.9% for GTR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.4% for GTR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GTR charges 0.70% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GTR currently yields 5.32% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
GTR and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GTR or VOO?
GTR has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GTR or VOO?
Over the past year GTR returned +17.91% vs +22.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), GTR annualized +5.69% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GTR or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 9.9% for GTR. Worst drawdown: GTR -21.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GTR and VOO?
GTR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between GTR and VOO?
GTR and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GTR or VOO?
GTR yields 5.32% while VOO yields 1.09%, so GTR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.