GTR vs VOO

GTR vs VOO

Which is better, GTR or VOO?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGTRVOO
Expense Ratio0.70%0.03%Best
AUM$73M$997.4B
Dividend Yield5.31%1.04%
Holdings12509
YTD Return+9.61%+12.37%Best
1Y Return+12.42%+16.61%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+13.54%+21.37%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+5.49%+13.49%Best
Volatility (annualized)9.8%Best15.6%
Max Drawdown-21.4%Best-24.5%
$10,000 over 5 years$13,063$18,827Best
Fund FamilyWisdomTree InvestmentsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 7, 2021Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 7, 2021 to Sep 18, 2026 (4.9 years).

GTR vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.9 years both funds cover.

GTR vs VOO Performance

WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GTR returned +12.42% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, GTR is up 9.61% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.

Over three years, GTR compounded at +13.54% per year against +21.37% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +5.49% and +13.49% respectively.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 9.8% for GTR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.4% for GTR and -24.5% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GTR charges 0.70% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GTR currently yields 5.31% against 1.04% for VOO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GTR and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GTRVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GTR or VOO?

GTR has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, GTR or VOO?

Over the past year GTR returned +12.42% vs +16.61% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GTR or VOO?

VOO has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 9.8% for GTR. Worst drawdown: GTR -21.4% vs VOO -24.5%.

Should I hold both GTR and VOO?

GTR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, GTR or VOO?

GTR yields 5.31% while VOO yields 1.04%, so GTR currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than GTR?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.