GUSH vs VTI
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. Bull 2X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GUSH or VTI?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GUSH led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GUSH | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.94% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $249M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.05% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 60 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +105.57%Best | +12.28% |
| 1Y Return | +90.40%Best | +16.78% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.05% | +20.89%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +21.64%Best | +11.94% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 102.6% | 15.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $26,631Best | $17,576 |
| Top 10 Weight | 49.8% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 28, 2015 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 29, 2015 to Sep 17, 2026 (11.3 years).
GUSH vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.3 years both funds cover.
GUSH vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. Bull 2X ETF (GUSH) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GUSH returned +90.40% while VTI returned +16.78%. Year to date, GUSH is up 105.57% versus a gain of 12.28% for VTI.
Over three years, GUSH compounded at +7.05% per year against +20.89% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +21.64% and +11.94% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.29% annualized vs -41.01%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GUSH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 102.6% compared with 15.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GUSH charges 0.94% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $94 vs $3 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GUSH currently yields 1.05% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
62.6% of GUSH's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.6% of VTI's money is in holdings GUSH also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
48 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in GUSH and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 60 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 54 and 3,463 positions we hold weights for.
VTI holds 1,119 positions GUSH does not, 94.8% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 6.40%, AAPL 6.29%, MSFT 4.79%, AMZN 3.65%, GOOGL 2.90%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GUSH | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PBFPbf Energy Inc | 2.46% | 0.01% | 2.45% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.53% | 0.89% | 0.64% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 2.04% | 0.13% | 1.91% |
| DKDelek Us Holdings Inc | 2.08% | 0.01% | 2.07% |
| VLOValero Energy | 1.96% | 0.13% | 1.83% |
| DINOHF Sinclair Corp | 2.06% | 0.02% | 2.04% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 1.56% | 0.52% | 1.04% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 1.94% | 0.12% | 1.82% |
| PARRPar Pacific Holdings Inc | 1.94% | 0.01% | 1.93% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 1.59% | 0.20% | 1.39% |
62.6% of GUSH is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GUSH or VTI?
GUSH has an expense ratio of 0.94% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $91 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GUSH or VTI?
Over the past year GUSH returned +90.40% vs +16.78% for VTI, so GUSH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), GUSH annualized -41.01% vs +12.29% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GUSH or VTI?
GUSH has been the more volatile fund at 102.6% annualized versus 15.6% for VTI.
Should I hold both GUSH and VTI?
GUSH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GUSH and VTI?
62.6% of GUSH's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.6% of VTI's is in holdings GUSH also owns. They hold 48 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in GUSH and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, GUSH or VTI?
GUSH yields 1.05% while VTI yields 1.03%, so GUSH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GUSH?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GUSH led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.