GVAL vs VYM
Cambria Global Value ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GVAL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GVAL | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $574M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.47% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 121 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +19.28% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.14% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.41% | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.79% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Cambria Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 11, 2014 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GVAL vs VYM Performance
Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) is a ETF from Cambria Investment Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GVAL returned +35.14% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, GVAL is up 19.28% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Over three years, GVAL compounded at +27.41% per year against +18.43% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +14.79% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.09% annualized vs +6.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GVAL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.8% for GVAL and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GVAL charges 0.66% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $4 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GVAL currently yields 2.47% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GVAL and VYM share 1 holdings out of 669 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GVAL | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BG | 1.02% | 0.07% | 0.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GVAL or VYM?
GVAL has an expense ratio of 0.66% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GVAL or VYM?
Over the past year GVAL returned +35.14% vs +26.05% for VYM, so GVAL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), GVAL annualized +6.95% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GVAL or VYM?
GVAL has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GVAL -46.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GVAL and VYM?
GVAL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GVAL and VYM?
GVAL and VYM share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 669 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GVAL or VYM?
GVAL yields 2.47% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.