GVAL vs VOO
Cambria Global Value ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. GVAL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GVAL | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $574M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.47% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 121 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +19.28% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.14% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.41% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.79% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Cambria Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 11, 2014 | Sep 7, 2010 |
GVAL vs VOO Performance
Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) is a ETF from Cambria Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GVAL returned +35.14% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, GVAL is up 19.28% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, GVAL compounded at +27.41% per year against +21.47% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +14.79% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +6.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GVAL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.8% for GVAL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GVAL charges 0.66% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $3 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GVAL currently yields 2.47% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
GVAL and VOO share 1 holdings out of 616 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GVAL | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BG | 1.02% | 0.02% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GVAL or VOO?
GVAL has an expense ratio of 0.66% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GVAL or VOO?
Over the past year GVAL returned +35.14% vs +22.62% for VOO, so GVAL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), GVAL annualized +6.95% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GVAL or VOO?
GVAL has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GVAL -46.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GVAL and VOO?
GVAL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GVAL and VOO?
GVAL and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 616 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GVAL or VOO?
GVAL yields 2.47% while VOO yields 1.09%, so GVAL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.