GVAL vs VTI
Cambria Global Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GVAL or VTI?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GVAL led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window. GVAL is less concentrated, with 24.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GVAL | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $576M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.31% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 123 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +19.66%Best | +13.35% |
| 1Y Return | +30.77%Best | +15.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +30.77%Best | +23.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.76%Best | +12.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 15.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -46.8% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,905Best | $18,286 |
| Top 10 Weight | 24.9%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Cambria Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 11, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 12, 2014 to Oct 2, 2026 (12.6 years).
GVAL vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.6 years both funds cover.
GVAL vs VTI Performance
Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) is an ETF from Cambria Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GVAL returned +30.77% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, GVAL is up 19.66% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, GVAL compounded at +30.77% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +14.76% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.07% annualized vs +6.90%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GVAL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 15.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.8% for GVAL and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GVAL charges 0.68% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $3 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GVAL currently yields 2.31% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
1.1% of GVAL's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.4% of VTI's money is in holdings GVAL also owns.
GVAL and VTI share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 113 positions we hold weights for in GVAL and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 123 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,149 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for GVAL (97.0% of the fund), and 7 for GVAL that do not appear in VTI (8.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GVAL | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 1.11% | 0.41% | 0.70% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GVAL and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GVAL or VTI?
GVAL has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $65 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GVAL or VTI?
Over the past year GVAL returned +30.77% vs +15.92% for VTI, so GVAL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), GVAL annualized +6.90% vs +12.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GVAL or VTI?
GVAL has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 15.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GVAL -46.8% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both GVAL and VTI?
GVAL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GVAL and VTI?
1.1% of GVAL's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.4% of VTI's is in holdings GVAL also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 113 positions we hold weights for in GVAL and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, GVAL or VTI?
GVAL yields 2.31% while VTI yields 1.03%, so GVAL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GVAL?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GVAL led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window. GVAL is less concentrated, with 24.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.