GVAL vs VTI
Cambria Global Value ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GVAL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GVAL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $574M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.47% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 121 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +20.35% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.56% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.73% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.77% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Cambria Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 11, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
GVAL vs VTI Performance
Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) is a ETF from Cambria Investment Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GVAL returned +34.56% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, GVAL is up 20.35% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, GVAL compounded at +27.73% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +14.77% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GVAL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.8% for GVAL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GVAL charges 0.66% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $3 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GVAL currently yields 2.47% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GVAL and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2894 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GVAL | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BG | 1.02% | 0.02% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GVAL or VTI?
GVAL has an expense ratio of 0.66% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GVAL or VTI?
Over the past year GVAL returned +34.56% vs +22.39% for VTI, so GVAL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), GVAL annualized +7.02% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GVAL or VTI?
GVAL has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GVAL -46.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GVAL and VTI?
GVAL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GVAL and VTI?
GVAL and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2894 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GVAL or VTI?
GVAL yields 2.47% while VTI yields 1.07%, so GVAL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.