HECO vs QQQ
State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, HECO or QQQ?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. HECO led over 1Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HECO | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $76M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 55 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +44.31%Best | +15.18% |
| 1Y Return | +56.32%Best | +19.65% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.60% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.94% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 49.3% | 18.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -44.6% | -22.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $24,655Best | $15,480 |
| Top 10 Weight | 63.7% | 46.5%Best |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 9, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 10, 2024 to Sep 15, 2026 (2 years).
HECO vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
HECO vs QQQ Performance
State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year HECO returned +56.32% while QQQ returned +19.65%. Year to date, HECO is up 44.31% versus a gain of 15.18% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HECO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 49.3% compared with 18.7% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.6% for HECO and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HECO charges 0.90% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $18 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HECO currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
21.8% of HECO's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 24.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings HECO also owns.
QQQ and HECO share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in HECO and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 55 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 89 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for HECO (73.1% of the fund), and 20 for HECO that do not appear in QQQ (71.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HECO | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.39% | 8.44% | 3.05% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.08% | 5.76% | 0.32% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.58% | 4.43% | 1.85% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 3.09% | 0.94% | 2.15% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 2.53% | 1.30% | 1.23% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 1.00% | 1.86% | 0.86% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 1.15% | 1.69% | 0.54% |
24.4% of QQQ is already inside HECO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HECO or QQQ?
HECO has an expense ratio of 0.90% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HECO or QQQ?
Over the past year HECO returned +56.32% vs +19.65% for QQQ, so HECO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), HECO annualized +57.02% vs +24.42% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HECO or QQQ?
HECO has been the more volatile fund at 49.3% annualized versus 18.7% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: HECO -44.6% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both HECO and QQQ?
HECO and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HECO and QQQ?
24.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings HECO also owns. 24.4% of QQQ's is in holdings HECO also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in HECO and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, HECO or QQQ?
HECO yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than HECO?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. HECO led over 1Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.