HERO vs VYM
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HERO | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $67M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.75% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 88 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | -9.09% | +15.75% | |
| 1Y Return | -16.97% | +23.85% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.87% | +19.14% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.09% | +12.45% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.9% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -54.0% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 25, 2019 | Nov 10, 2006 |
HERO vs VYM Performance
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HERO returned -16.97% while VYM returned +23.85%. Year to date, HERO is down 9.09% versus a gain of 15.75% for VYM.
Over three years, HERO compounded at +13.87% per year against +19.14% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -0.09% and +12.45% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, HERO has the edge at +9.94% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HERO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.0% for HERO and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HERO charges 0.50% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $4 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HERO currently yields 1.75% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
HERO and VYM share 0 holdings out of 641 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HERO or VYM?
HERO has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HERO or VYM?
Over the past year HERO returned -16.97% vs +23.85% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), HERO annualized +9.94% vs +7.06% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HERO or VYM?
HERO has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: HERO -54.0% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both HERO and VYM?
HERO and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HERO and VYM?
HERO and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 641 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HERO or VYM?
HERO yields 1.75% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.