HERO vs QQQ
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HERO | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $67M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.75% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 88 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -8.87% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | -15.25% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.93% | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.21% | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -54.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 25, 2019 | Mar 10, 1999 |
HERO vs QQQ Performance
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year HERO returned -15.25% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, HERO is down 8.87% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Over three years, HERO compounded at +13.93% per year against +25.75% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -0.21% and +14.78% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +9.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 20.9% for HERO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.0% for HERO and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HERO charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HERO currently yields 1.75% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
HERO and QQQ share 1 holdings out of 139 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HERO | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTWO | 7.79% | 0.19% | 7.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HERO or QQQ?
HERO has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HERO or QQQ?
Over the past year HERO returned -15.25% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), HERO annualized +9.97% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HERO or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 20.9% for HERO. Worst drawdown: HERO -54.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both HERO and QQQ?
HERO and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HERO and QQQ?
HERO and QQQ share 1 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 139 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HERO or QQQ?
HERO yields 1.75% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so HERO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.