HERO vs VTI
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HERO | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $67M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.75% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 88 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -8.14% | +13.67% | |
| 1Y Return | -15.37% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.25% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.08% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -54.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 25, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
HERO vs VTI Performance
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HERO returned -15.37% while VTI returned +22.17%. Year to date, HERO is down 8.14% versus a gain of 13.67% for VTI.
Over three years, HERO compounded at +14.25% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.08% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, HERO has the edge at +10.10% annualized vs +8.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HERO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.0% for HERO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HERO charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HERO currently yields 1.75% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
HERO and VTI share 5 holdings out of 2820 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HERO or VTI?
HERO has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HERO or VTI?
Over the past year HERO returned -15.37% vs +22.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), HERO annualized +10.10% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HERO or VTI?
HERO has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: HERO -54.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both HERO and VTI?
HERO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HERO and VTI?
HERO and VTI share 5 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2820 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HERO or VTI?
HERO yields 1.75% while VTI yields 1.07%, so HERO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.