HERO vs VOO
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HERO | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $67M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.75% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 88 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -9.09% | +12.95% | |
| 1Y Return | -16.97% | +20.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.87% | +22.09% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.09% | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -54.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 25, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
HERO vs VOO Performance
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HERO returned -16.97% while VOO returned +20.69%. Year to date, HERO is down 9.09% versus a gain of 12.95% for VOO.
Over three years, HERO compounded at +13.87% per year against +22.09% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -0.09% and +13.40% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.50% annualized vs +9.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HERO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.0% for HERO and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HERO charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HERO currently yields 1.75% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HERO or VOO?
HERO has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HERO or VOO?
Over the past year HERO returned -16.97% vs +20.69% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), HERO annualized +9.94% vs +13.50% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HERO or VOO?
HERO has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: HERO -54.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both HERO and VOO?
HERO and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HERO and VOO?
HERO and VOO share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 541 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HERO or VOO?
HERO yields 1.75% while VOO yields 1.08%, so HERO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.