HF vs IVV
DGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HF | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.70% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $20M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.46% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 26 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +11.63% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.82% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Days Global Advisors | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 2, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
HF vs IVV Performance
DGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETF (HF) is a ETF from Days Global Advisors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year HF returned +9.82% while IVV returned +21.64%. Year to date, HF is up 11.63% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.3% for HF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.3% for HF and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HF charges 1.70% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $170 vs $3 annually, a gap of $167 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HF currently yields 11.46% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
HF and IVV share 0 holdings out of 521 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HF or IVV?
HF has an expense ratio of 1.70% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $167 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HF or IVV?
Over the past year HF returned +9.82% vs +21.64% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), HF annualized +10.83% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HF or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.3% for HF. Worst drawdown: HF -4.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both HF and IVV?
HF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HF and IVV?
HF and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 521 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HF or IVV?
HF yields 11.46% while IVV yields 1.09%, so HF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.