HF vs VTI
DGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.70% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $20M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.46% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 26 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +11.63% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.82% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Days Global Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 2, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
HF vs VTI Performance
DGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETF (HF) is a ETF from Days Global Advisors and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HF returned +9.82% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, HF is up 11.63% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 7.3% for HF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.3% for HF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HF charges 1.70% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $170 vs $3 annually, a gap of $167 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HF currently yields 11.46% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
HF and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2799 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HF or VTI?
HF has an expense ratio of 1.70% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $167 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HF or VTI?
Over the past year HF returned +9.82% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), HF annualized +10.83% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HF or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 7.3% for HF. Worst drawdown: HF -4.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both HF and VTI?
HF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HF and VTI?
HF and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2799 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HF or VTI?
HF yields 11.46% while VTI yields 1.07%, so HF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.