HFND vs SCHD
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HFND | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $36M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.52% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 47 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +9.21% | +25.58% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.08% | +31.06% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.74% | +15.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.61% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.4% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.3% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Unlimited Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 10, 2022 | Oct 20, 2011 |
HFND vs SCHD Performance
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF (HFND) is a ETF from Unlimited Funds and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year HFND returned +14.08% while SCHD returned +31.06%. Year to date, HFND is up 9.21% versus a gain of 25.58% for SCHD.
Over three years, HFND compounded at +9.74% per year against +15.55% for SCHD. Across the full 4-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.46% annualized vs +8.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 7.4% for HFND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.3% for HFND and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HFND charges 1.07% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $6 annually, a gap of $101 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HFND currently yields 3.52% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
HFND and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 128 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HFND or SCHD?
HFND has an expense ratio of 1.07% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $101 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HFND or SCHD?
Over the past year HFND returned +14.08% vs +31.06% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), HFND annualized +8.47% vs +11.46% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HFND or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 7.4% for HFND. Worst drawdown: HFND -13.3% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both HFND and SCHD?
HFND and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HFND and SCHD?
HFND and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 128 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HFND or SCHD?
HFND yields 3.52% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so HFND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.