HFND vs VTI
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HFND | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $38M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.74% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 47 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +8.42% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.17% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.01% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Unlimited Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 10, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
HFND vs VTI Performance
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF (HFND) is a ETF from Unlimited Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HFND returned +13.17% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, HFND is up 8.42% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, HFND compounded at +10.01% per year against +21.54% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, HFND has the edge at +8.22% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 7.4% for HFND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.3% for HFND and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HFND charges 1.07% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HFND currently yields 4.74% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
HFND and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2815 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HFND or VTI?
HFND has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $104 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HFND or VTI?
Over the past year HFND returned +13.17% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), HFND annualized +8.22% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HFND or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 7.4% for HFND. Worst drawdown: HFND -13.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both HFND and VTI?
HFND and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HFND and VTI?
HFND and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2815 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HFND or VTI?
HFND yields 4.74% while VTI yields 1.07%, so HFND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.