HOLA vs IVV
JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, HOLA or IVV?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. HOLA is less concentrated, with 16.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HOLA | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $279M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.78% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 225 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +5.47% | +12.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.14% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.38% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.1%Best | 12.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -7.0%Best | -8.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $11,518 | $12,411Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 16.6%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 11, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.2 years).
HOLA vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
HOLA vs IVV Performance
JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year HOLA returned +12.14% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, HOLA is up 5.47% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.4% compared with 7.1% for HOLA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -7.0% for HOLA and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HOLA charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HOLA currently yields 2.78% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 203 holdings in HOLA and 490 in IVV, totalling 98.6% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 203 positions we hold weights for in HOLA and 490 in IVV, against full books of 225 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 482 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for HOLA (98.6% of the fund), and 13 for HOLA that do not appear in IVV (7.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of HOLA and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HOLA or IVV?
HOLA has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HOLA or IVV?
Over the past year HOLA returned +12.14% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), HOLA annualized +12.50% vs +19.72% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HOLA or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.4% annualized versus 7.1% for HOLA. Worst drawdown: HOLA -7.0% vs IVV -8.9%.
Should I hold both HOLA and IVV?
HOLA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, HOLA or IVV?
HOLA yields 2.78% while IVV yields 1.06%, so HOLA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than HOLA?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. HOLA is less concentrated, with 16.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.