HOLA vs QQQ
JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, HOLA or QQQ?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. HOLA is less concentrated, with 16.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HOLA | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $279M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.78% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 225 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +5.47% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.14% | +21.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.63% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.24% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.1%Best | 20.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -7.0%Best | -12.0% |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $11,518 | $13,092Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 16.6%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 11, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.2 years).
HOLA vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
HOLA vs QQQ Performance
JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year HOLA returned +12.14% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, HOLA is up 5.47% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.4% compared with 7.1% for HOLA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -7.0% for HOLA and -12.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HOLA charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HOLA currently yields 2.78% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
3.6% of HOLA's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.9% of QQQ's money is in holdings HOLA also owns.
HOLA and QQQ share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 203 positions we hold weights for in HOLA and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 225 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 96 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for HOLA (97.5% of the fund), and 13 for HOLA that do not appear in QQQ (7.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of HOLA and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HOLA or QQQ?
HOLA has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HOLA or QQQ?
Over the past year HOLA returned +12.14% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), HOLA annualized +12.50% vs +25.17% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HOLA or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.4% annualized versus 7.1% for HOLA. Worst drawdown: HOLA -7.0% vs QQQ -12.0%.
Should I hold both HOLA and QQQ?
HOLA and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HOLA and QQQ?
3.6% of HOLA's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.9% of QQQ's is in holdings HOLA also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 203 positions we hold weights for in HOLA and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, HOLA or QQQ?
HOLA yields 2.78% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so HOLA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than HOLA?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. HOLA is less concentrated, with 16.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.