HUMM vs PCLG
800VDC AI Datacenter Ecosystem ETF vs Polen Focus Growth ETF
Which is better, HUMM or PCLG?
HUMM and PCLG are close on what we can measure.
HUMM is less concentrated, with 57.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HUMM | PCLG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49%Tie | 0.49%Tie |
| AUM | $2M | $92M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.04% |
| Holdings | 20 | 27 |
| YTD Return | -6.31%Best | -8.26% |
| 1Y Return | - | -12.48% |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.0%Best | 62.6% |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Polen Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2026 | Sep 30, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
HUMM vs PCLG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
HUMM vs PCLG Performance
800VDC AI Datacenter Ecosystem ETF (HUMM) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) is an ETF from Polen Capital. Year to date, HUMM is down 6.31% versus a loss of 8.26% for PCLG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HUMM charges 0.49% per year while PCLG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $49 annually. On income, HUMM currently yields 0.00% against 0.04% for PCLG.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 20 holdings in HUMM and 29 in PCLG, totalling 99.3% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in HUMM and 29 in PCLG, against full books of 20 and 27.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 24 positions for PCLG that do not appear in our book for HUMM (90.9% of the fund), and 13 for HUMM that do not appear in PCLG (68.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of HUMM and PCLG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HUMM or PCLG?
HUMM has an expense ratio of 0.49% while PCLG charges 0.49%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which pays a higher dividend, HUMM or PCLG?
HUMM yields 0.00% while PCLG yields 0.04%, so PCLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PCLG better than HUMM?
HUMM is less concentrated, with 57.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.