HUMM vs THRO
800VDC AI Datacenter Ecosystem ETF vs iShares US Thematic Rotation Active ETF
Which is better, HUMM or THRO?
HUMM costs less.
HUMM has a lower expense ratio. THRO is less concentrated, with 43.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HUMM | THRO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49%Best | 0.57% |
| AUM | $2M | $7.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.30% |
| Holdings | 20 | 251 |
| YTD Return | -7.76% | +14.09%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.26% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.05% |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.0% | 43.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | BlackRock, Inc. (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2026 | Dec 14, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
HUMM vs THRO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
HUMM vs THRO Performance
800VDC AI Datacenter Ecosystem ETF (HUMM) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and iShares US Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US). Year to date, HUMM is down 7.76% versus a gain of 14.09% for THRO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HUMM charges 0.49% per year while THRO charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $57 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HUMM currently yields 0.00% against 0.30% for THRO.
Holdings Overlap
9.0% of HUMM's money is in holdings THRO also owns. 0.4% of THRO's money is in holdings HUMM also owns.
HUMM and THRO share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in HUMM and 247 in THRO, against full books of 20 and 251.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 159 positions for THRO that do not appear in our book for HUMM (98.4% of the fund), and 11 for HUMM that do not appear in THRO (59.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of HUMM and THRO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HUMM or THRO?
HUMM has an expense ratio of 0.49% while THRO charges 0.57%. HUMM is the cheaper option, by $8 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between HUMM and THRO?
9.0% of HUMM's money is in holdings THRO also owns. 0.4% of THRO's is in holdings HUMM also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in HUMM and 247 in THRO.
Which pays a higher dividend, HUMM or THRO?
HUMM yields 0.00% while THRO yields 0.30%, so THRO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is THRO better than HUMM?
HUMM has a lower expense ratio. THRO is less concentrated, with 43.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.