IBRN vs IVV
iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IBRN delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBRN | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.82% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 80 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +23.48% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +70.78% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.98% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
IBRN vs IVV Performance
iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF (IBRN) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IBRN returned +70.78% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, IBRN is up 23.48% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Over three years, IBRN compounded at +18.98% per year against +21.47% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, IBRN has the edge at +12.97% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IBRN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.4% for IBRN and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBRN charges 0.47% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBRN currently yields 0.82% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBRN or IVV?
IBRN has an expense ratio of 0.47% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IBRN or IVV?
Over the past year IBRN returned +70.78% vs +22.61% for IVV, so IBRN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IBRN annualized +12.97% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IBRN or IVV?
IBRN has been the more volatile fund at 21.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IBRN -35.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IBRN and IVV?
IBRN and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IBRN and IVV?
IBRN and IVV share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 573 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBRN or IVV?
IBRN yields 0.82% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.