IBRN vs VTI
iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IBRN delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBRN | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.82% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 80 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +23.48% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +70.78% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.98% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
IBRN vs VTI Performance
iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF (IBRN) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IBRN returned +70.78% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, IBRN is up 23.48% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, IBRN compounded at +18.98% per year against +21.17% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, IBRN has the edge at +12.97% annualized vs +8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IBRN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.4% for IBRN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBRN charges 0.47% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBRN currently yields 0.82% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
IBRN and VTI share 37 holdings out of 2816 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBRN or VTI?
IBRN has an expense ratio of 0.47% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IBRN or VTI?
Over the past year IBRN returned +70.78% vs +23.31% for VTI, so IBRN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IBRN annualized +12.97% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IBRN or VTI?
IBRN has been the more volatile fund at 21.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IBRN -35.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IBRN and VTI?
IBRN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IBRN and VTI?
IBRN and VTI share 37 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2816 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBRN or VTI?
IBRN yields 0.82% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.