IBTK vs IVV
iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBTK | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.07% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $965M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.79% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 28 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -0.34% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.47% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.60% | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.08% | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 14, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
IBTK vs IVV Performance
iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF (IBTK) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IBTK returned +1.47% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, IBTK is down 0.34% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, IBTK compounded at +3.60% per year against +21.49% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -1.08% and +13.43% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs -1.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 6.4% for IBTK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.1% for IBTK and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBTK charges 0.07% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $3 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBTK currently yields 3.79% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
IBTK and IVV share 1 holdings out of 528 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IBTK | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLA | 0.17% | 0.15% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBTK or IVV?
IBTK has an expense ratio of 0.07% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IBTK or IVV?
Over the past year IBTK returned +1.47% vs +23.70% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), IBTK annualized -1.65% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IBTK or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 6.4% for IBTK. Worst drawdown: IBTK -23.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IBTK and IVV?
IBTK and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IBTK and IVV?
IBTK and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 528 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBTK or IVV?
IBTK yields 3.79% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IBTK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.