IBTK vs VYM
IBTK vs VYM
iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBTK | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.07% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $965M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.79% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 28 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -0.34% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.47% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.60% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.08% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.4% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 14, 2020 | Nov 10, 2006 |
IBTK vs VYM Performance
iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF (IBTK) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IBTK returned +1.47% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, IBTK is down 0.34% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, IBTK compounded at +3.60% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -1.08% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs -1.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 6.4% for IBTK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.1% for IBTK and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBTK charges 0.07% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $4 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBTK currently yields 3.79% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
IBTK and VYM share 0 holdings out of 582 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBTK or VYM?
IBTK has an expense ratio of 0.07% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IBTK or VYM?
Over the past year IBTK returned +1.47% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), IBTK annualized -1.65% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IBTK or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 6.4% for IBTK. Worst drawdown: IBTK -23.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both IBTK and VYM?
IBTK and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IBTK and VYM?
IBTK and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 582 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBTK or VYM?
IBTK yields 3.79% while VYM yields 2.86%, so IBTK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.