ICMO vs IVV
Symmetry Panoramic International Country Momentum ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ICMO or IVV?
IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 74.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ICMO | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.86% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1M | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 19 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -4.77% | +13.49%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.85% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.93% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.76% |
| Top 10 Weight | 74.1% | 38.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Symmetry Partners | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 29, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ICMO vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ICMO vs IVV Performance
Symmetry Panoramic International Country Momentum ETF (ICMO) is an ETF from Symmetry Partners and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, ICMO is down 4.77% versus a gain of 13.49% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ICMO charges 0.86% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $86 vs $3 annually, a gap of $83 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ICMO currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 19 holdings in ICMO and 506 in IVV, totalling 99.9% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 19 positions we hold weights for in ICMO and 506 in IVV, against full books of 19 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 19 and 506 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 500 positions ICMO does not, 99.4% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.44%, AAPL 7.29%, MSFT 5.76%, AMZN 3.68%, GOOGL 3.00%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ICMO and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ICMO or IVV?
ICMO has an expense ratio of 0.86% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $83 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, ICMO or IVV?
ICMO yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ICMO?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 74.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.