ICOP vs IVV
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ICOP delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ICOP | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $460M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.76% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 60 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +26.98% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +88.71% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +38.22% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 21, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
ICOP vs IVV Performance
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ICOP returned +88.71% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, ICOP is up 26.98% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, ICOP compounded at +38.22% per year against +21.81% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, ICOP has the edge at +34.90% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ICOP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.6% for ICOP and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ICOP charges 0.47% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ICOP currently yields 1.76% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ICOP and IVV share 3 holdings out of 548 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ICOP or IVV?
ICOP has an expense ratio of 0.47% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ICOP or IVV?
Over the past year ICOP returned +88.71% vs +20.94% for IVV, so ICOP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), ICOP annualized +34.90% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ICOP or IVV?
ICOP has been the more volatile fund at 29.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ICOP -37.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ICOP and IVV?
ICOP and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ICOP and IVV?
ICOP and IVV share 3 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 548 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ICOP or IVV?
ICOP yields 1.76% while IVV yields 1.10%, so ICOP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.