ICOP vs VTI
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ICOP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ICOP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $460M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.76% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 60 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +26.98% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +88.71% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +38.22% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 21, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
ICOP vs VTI Performance
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ICOP returned +88.71% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, ICOP is up 26.98% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, ICOP compounded at +38.22% per year against +21.54% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, ICOP has the edge at +34.90% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ICOP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.6% for ICOP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ICOP charges 0.47% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ICOP currently yields 1.76% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ICOP or VTI?
ICOP has an expense ratio of 0.47% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ICOP or VTI?
Over the past year ICOP returned +88.71% vs +21.39% for VTI, so ICOP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), ICOP annualized +34.90% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ICOP or VTI?
ICOP has been the more volatile fund at 29.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ICOP -37.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ICOP and VTI?
ICOP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ICOP and VTI?
ICOP and VTI share 2 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2831 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ICOP or VTI?
ICOP yields 1.76% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ICOP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.