ICOP vs QQQ
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. ICOP delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ICOP | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $460M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.76% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 60 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +32.71% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +95.05% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +39.77% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 21, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
ICOP vs QQQ Performance
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ICOP returned +95.05% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, ICOP is up 32.71% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, ICOP compounded at +39.77% per year against +25.96% for QQQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, ICOP has the edge at +36.76% annualized vs +13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 29.8% for ICOP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.6% for ICOP and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ICOP charges 0.47% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $18 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ICOP currently yields 1.76% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
ICOP and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 148 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ICOP or QQQ?
ICOP has an expense ratio of 0.47% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $29 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ICOP or QQQ?
Over the past year ICOP returned +95.05% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so ICOP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), ICOP annualized +36.76% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ICOP or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 29.8% for ICOP. Worst drawdown: ICOP -37.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both ICOP and QQQ?
ICOP and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ICOP and QQQ?
ICOP and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 148 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ICOP or QQQ?
ICOP yields 1.76% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so ICOP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.