ICOP vs VOO
ICOP vs VOO
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ICOP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ICOP | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $425M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.81% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 60 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +23.76% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +86.04% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +33.53% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 21, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
ICOP vs VOO Performance
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ICOP returned +86.04% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, ICOP is up 23.76% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, ICOP compounded at +33.53% per year against +21.50% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, ICOP has the edge at +34.25% annualized vs +13.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ICOP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.6% for ICOP and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ICOP charges 0.47% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ICOP currently yields 1.81% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ICOP or VOO?
ICOP has an expense ratio of 0.47% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ICOP or VOO?
Over the past year ICOP returned +86.04% vs +23.71% for VOO, so ICOP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), ICOP annualized +34.25% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ICOP or VOO?
ICOP has been the more volatile fund at 28.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ICOP -37.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ICOP and VOO?
ICOP and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ICOP and VOO?
ICOP and VOO share 2 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 549 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ICOP or VOO?
ICOP yields 1.81% while VOO yields 1.09%, so ICOP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.