ICRC vs IVV
Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ICRC | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.98% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | - | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -31.52% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Bitwise | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 1, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
ICRC vs IVV Performance
Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF (ICRC) is a ETF from Bitwise and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, ICRC is down 31.52% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.1% for ICRC and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ICRC charges 0.98% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $98 vs $3 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ICRC or IVV?
ICRC has an expense ratio of 0.98% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $95 per year of difference.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.