ICRC vs VTI

ICRC vs VTI

Which is better, ICRC or VTI?

Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricICRCVTI
Expense Ratio0.96%0.03%Best
AUM$348,981$666.9B
Dividend Yield59.40%1.03%
Holdings23,543
Fund FamilyBitwiseVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleOption WritingLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 1, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

The two price series end 49 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. ICRC has data through Jul 31, 2026 and VTI through Sep 18, 2026.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ICRC charges 0.96% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $96 vs $3 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ICRC currently yields 59.40% against 1.03% for VTI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of ICRC and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

ICRCVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ICRC or VTI?

ICRC has an expense ratio of 0.96% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $93 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which pays a higher dividend, ICRC or VTI?

ICRC yields 59.40% while VTI yields 1.03%, so ICRC currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than ICRC?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.