ICSH vs IVV
iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ICSH or IVV?
Ultrashort Term Bond against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ICSH | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $8.6B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.27% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 393 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -0.40% | +12.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.56% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.88% | +21.27%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.21% | +12.95%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.3%Best | 14.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -23.3%Best | -33.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,711 | $18,384Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Ultrashort Term Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 11, 2013 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 13, 2013 to Sep 11, 2026 (12.7 years).
ICSH vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ICSH vs IVV Performance
iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ICSH returned +0.56% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, ICSH is down 0.40% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.
Over three years, ICSH compounded at +3.88% per year against +21.27% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +3.21% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.78% annualized vs +2.08%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 10.3% for ICSH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.3% for ICSH and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.06. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ICSH charges 0.08% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $3 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ICSH currently yields 4.27% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.2% of IVV's money is in holdings ICSH also owns.
Stated as a floor: for ICSH, our book for it covers 20.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 117 positions we hold weights for in ICSH and 505 in IVV, against full books of 393 and 508.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ICSH | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLABlackrock Cash Funds: Treasury, Sl Agency Shares | 0.23% | 0.18% | 0.05% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ICSH and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ICSH or IVV?
ICSH has an expense ratio of 0.08% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ICSH or IVV?
Over the past year ICSH returned +0.56% vs +17.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), ICSH annualized +2.08% vs +12.78% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ICSH or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 10.3% for ICSH. Worst drawdown: ICSH -23.3% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both ICSH and IVV?
ICSH and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.06, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ICSH or IVV?
ICSH yields 4.27% while IVV yields 1.06%, so ICSH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ICSH?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.