IDGT vs QQQ
iShares US Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. IDGT delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IDGT | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.37% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $543M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.81% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 30 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +37.48% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +44.49% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.28% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.91% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -78.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2001 | Mar 10, 1999 |
IDGT vs QQQ Performance
iShares US Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IDGT returned +44.49% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, IDGT is up 37.48% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, IDGT compounded at +23.28% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +10.91% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +4.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 28.8% for IDGT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.0% for IDGT and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IDGT charges 0.37% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $37 vs $18 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IDGT currently yields 0.81% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
IDGT and QQQ share 3 holdings out of 125 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IDGT or QQQ?
IDGT has an expense ratio of 0.37% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $19 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IDGT or QQQ?
Over the past year IDGT returned +44.49% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so IDGT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), IDGT annualized +4.55% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IDGT or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 28.8% for IDGT. Worst drawdown: IDGT -78.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both IDGT and QQQ?
IDGT and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IDGT and QQQ?
IDGT and QQQ share 3 common holdings with a 3.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 125 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IDGT or QQQ?
IDGT yields 0.81% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so IDGT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.