IDGT vs VOO
iShares US Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. IDGT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IDGT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.37% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $543M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.81% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 30 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +37.48% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +44.49% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.28% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.91% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -78.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2001 | Sep 7, 2010 |
IDGT vs VOO Performance
iShares US Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IDGT returned +44.49% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, IDGT is up 37.48% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, IDGT compounded at +23.28% per year against +22.06% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.91% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +4.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IDGT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.0% for IDGT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IDGT charges 0.37% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $37 vs $3 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IDGT currently yields 0.81% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
IDGT and VOO share 12 holdings out of 519 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IDGT or VOO?
IDGT has an expense ratio of 0.37% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $34 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IDGT or VOO?
Over the past year IDGT returned +44.49% vs +21.87% for VOO, so IDGT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IDGT annualized +4.55% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IDGT or VOO?
IDGT has been the more volatile fund at 28.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: IDGT -78.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both IDGT and VOO?
IDGT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IDGT and VOO?
IDGT and VOO share 12 common holdings with a 2.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 519 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IDGT or VOO?
IDGT yields 0.81% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.