IDHQ vs VTI
Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IDHQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IDHQ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.99% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 214 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +30.66% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +43.14% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.06% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.21% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -74.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
IDHQ vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF (IDHQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IDHQ returned +43.14% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, IDHQ is up 30.66% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, IDHQ compounded at +23.06% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.21% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +4.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IDHQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -74.5% for IDHQ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IDHQ charges 0.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IDHQ currently yields 1.99% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IDHQ or VTI?
IDHQ has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IDHQ or VTI?
Over the past year IDHQ returned +43.14% vs +22.35% for VTI, so IDHQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), IDHQ annualized +4.00% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IDHQ or VTI?
IDHQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IDHQ -74.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IDHQ and VTI?
IDHQ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IDHQ and VTI?
IDHQ and VTI share 2 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2984 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IDHQ or VTI?
IDHQ yields 1.99% while VTI yields 1.07%, so IDHQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.