IDHQ vs VXUS
Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, IDHQ or VXUS?
IDHQ has been ahead.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. IDHQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IDHQ | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $1.0B | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.94% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 214 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +24.76%Best | +14.48% |
| 1Y Return | +34.15%Best | +22.28% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.82%Best | +20.00% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.03%Best | +8.91% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 15.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.5%Best | -39.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,407Best | $15,323 |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2007 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 28, 2011 to Sep 11, 2026 (15.6 years).
IDHQ vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.6 years both funds cover.
IDHQ vs VXUS Performance
Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF (IDHQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IDHQ returned +34.15% while VXUS returned +22.28%. Year to date, IDHQ is up 24.76% versus a gain of 14.48% for VXUS.
Over three years, IDHQ compounded at +20.82% per year against +20.00% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +9.03% and +8.91% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, IDHQ has the edge at +6.75% annualized vs +4.82%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IDHQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 15.0% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.5% for IDHQ and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IDHQ charges 0.29% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $5 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IDHQ currently yields 1.94% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 74.1% of IDHQ's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 87.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of IDHQ is already inside VXUS. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
146 positions in common, counted across the 199 positions we hold weights for in IDHQ and 8,091 in VXUS, against full books of 214 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IDHQ | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML:ASAsml Holding Adr Representing Nv | 4.61% | 1.70% | 2.91% |
| NOVN:SMNovartis Ag Ordinary Shares | 4.36% | 0.65% | 3.71% |
| NESN:SMNestl? Sa | 3.44% | 0.59% | 2.85% |
| RR:LNRolls-Royce Plc | 2.82% | 0.36% | 2.46% |
| ABBN:SMABB Ltd. - Ordinary Shares | 2.47% | 0.37% | 2.10% |
| SAF:PASafran Sa | 2.43% | 0.30% | 2.13% |
| 6857:JPAdvantest Corp | 2.34% | 0.33% | 2.01% |
| 8035:JPTokyo Electron Ltd. Com Stk | 1.87% | 0.47% | 1.40% |
| ULVR:LNUnilever Plc Ordinary Shares | 2.03% | 0.28% | 1.75% |
| ENR1.N:SGSiemens Energy Ag | 1.94% | 0.32% | 1.62% |
74.1% of IDHQ is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IDHQ or VXUS?
IDHQ has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IDHQ or VXUS?
Over the past year IDHQ returned +34.15% vs +22.28% for VXUS, so IDHQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IDHQ annualized +6.75% vs +4.82% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IDHQ or VXUS?
IDHQ has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 15.0% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: IDHQ -33.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both IDHQ and VXUS?
IDHQ and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IDHQ and VXUS?
At least 74.1% of IDHQ's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 146 positions in common, counted across the 199 positions we hold weights for in IDHQ and 8,091 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, IDHQ or VXUS?
IDHQ yields 1.94% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than IDHQ?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. IDHQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.