IDLV vs IVV
Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IDLV | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $345M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.75% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 215 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +8.49% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.61% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.52% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.39% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 13, 2012 | May 15, 2000 |
IDLV vs IVV Performance
Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IDLV returned +12.61% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, IDLV is up 8.49% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Over three years, IDLV compounded at +14.52% per year against +22.19% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +6.39% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +4.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.2% for IDLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.4% for IDLV and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IDLV charges 0.25% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IDLV currently yields 4.75% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
IDLV and IVV share 0 holdings out of 704 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IDLV or IVV?
IDLV has an expense ratio of 0.25% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IDLV or IVV?
Over the past year IDLV returned +12.61% vs +21.79% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), IDLV annualized +4.01% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IDLV or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.2% for IDLV. Worst drawdown: IDLV -36.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IDLV and IVV?
IDLV and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IDLV and IVV?
IDLV and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 704 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IDLV or IVV?
IDLV yields 4.75% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IDLV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.