IEZ vs VTI
iShares US Oil Equipment & Services ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IEZ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IEZ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.37% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $381M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.27% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 35 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +37.66% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +68.47% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.23% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +20.59% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -93.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 1, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
IEZ vs VTI Performance
iShares US Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IEZ returned +68.47% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, IEZ is up 37.66% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, IEZ compounded at +10.23% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +20.59% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs -2.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IEZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -93.5% for IEZ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IEZ charges 0.37% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $37 vs $3 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IEZ currently yields 1.27% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
IEZ and VTI share 25 holdings out of 2794 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IEZ or VTI?
IEZ has an expense ratio of 0.37% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $34 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IEZ or VTI?
Over the past year IEZ returned +68.47% vs +22.35% for VTI, so IEZ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IEZ annualized -2.44% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IEZ or VTI?
IEZ has been the more volatile fund at 37.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IEZ -93.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IEZ and VTI?
IEZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IEZ and VTI?
IEZ and VTI share 25 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2794 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IEZ or VTI?
IEZ yields 1.27% while VTI yields 1.07%, so IEZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.