IEZ vs VTI
iShares US Oil Equipment & Services ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, IEZ or VTI?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IEZ led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 74.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IEZ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.37% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $391M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.12% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 35 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +31.68%Best | +12.08% |
| 1Y Return | +52.66%Best | +16.31% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.12% | +20.83%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +18.30%Best | +11.89% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.8% | 15.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -93.5% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $23,170Best | $17,537 |
| Top 10 Weight | 74.0% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 1, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 5, 2006 to Sep 14, 2026 (20.4 years).
IEZ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 20.4 years both funds cover.
IEZ vs VTI Performance
iShares US Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IEZ returned +52.66% while VTI returned +16.31%. Year to date, IEZ is up 31.68% versus a gain of 12.08% for VTI.
Over three years, IEZ compounded at +6.12% per year against +20.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +18.30% and +11.89% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.30% annualized vs -2.65%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IEZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.8% compared with 15.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -93.5% for IEZ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IEZ charges 0.37% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $37 vs $3 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IEZ currently yields 1.12% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
96.3% of IEZ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.3% of VTI's money is in holdings IEZ also owns.
Most of IEZ is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
30 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in IEZ and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 35 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,138 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for IEZ (97.2% of the fund), and 1 for IEZ that do not appear in VTI (0.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IEZ | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SLBSchlumberger Nv. | 23.92% | 0.10% | 23.82% |
| BKRBaker Hughes Co | 22.28% | 0.08% | 22.20% |
| 0RMV:LNTechnipfmc Plc Ordinary Shares | 4.94% | 0.04% | 4.90% |
| HALHalliburton Co. | 4.10% | 0.03% | 4.07% |
| NOVNov Inc Common Stock | 3.80% | 0.01% | 3.79% |
| RIG:SMTransocean Ltd. | 2.91% | 0.01% | 2.90% |
| NENoble Corp Plc Ordinary Shares | 2.88% | 0.01% | 2.87% |
| KGSKodiak Gas Services Inccommon Stock | 2.86% | 0.01% | 2.85% |
| VALValaris Ltd. | 2.77% | 0.01% | 2.76% |
| AROCArchrock, Inc. | 2.75% | 0.01% | 2.74% |
96.3% of IEZ is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IEZ or VTI?
IEZ has an expense ratio of 0.37% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IEZ or VTI?
Over the past year IEZ returned +52.66% vs +16.31% for VTI, so IEZ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IEZ annualized -2.65% vs +9.30% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IEZ or VTI?
IEZ has been the more volatile fund at 37.8% annualized versus 15.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IEZ -93.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IEZ and VTI?
IEZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IEZ and VTI?
96.3% of IEZ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.3% of VTI's is in holdings IEZ also owns. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in IEZ and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, IEZ or VTI?
IEZ yields 1.12% while VTI yields 1.03%, so IEZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than IEZ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IEZ led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 74.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.