IFGL vs IVV
iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, IFGL or IVV?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IFGL is less concentrated, with 28.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IFGL | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $81M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.98% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 280 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -1.14% | +13.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.86% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.62% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.76% | +12.88%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.7% | 15.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -71.3% | -55.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $8,694 | $18,327Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 28.4%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 12, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 19, 2007 to Sep 4, 2026 (18.8 years).
IFGL vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 18.8 years both funds cover.
IFGL vs IVV Performance
iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IFGL returned +1.86% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, IFGL is down 1.14% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Over three years, IFGL compounded at +7.62% per year against +21.29% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -2.76% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.81% annualized vs -3.05%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IFGL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.7% compared with 15.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -71.3% for IFGL and -55.3% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IFGL charges 0.48% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $3 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IFGL currently yields 3.98% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
0.2% of IVV's money is in holdings IFGL also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 257 positions we hold weights for in IFGL and 505 in IVV, against full books of 280 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 496 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for IFGL (99.2% of the fund), and 1 for IFGL that do not appear in IVV (0.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IFGL | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLABlackrock Cash Funds: Treasury, Sl Agency Shares | 0.04% | 0.18% | 0.14% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IFGL and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IFGL or IVV?
IFGL has an expense ratio of 0.48% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IFGL or IVV?
Over the past year IFGL returned +1.86% vs +20.08% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), IFGL annualized -3.05% vs +9.81% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IFGL or IVV?
IFGL has been the more volatile fund at 19.7% annualized versus 15.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IFGL -71.3% vs IVV -55.3%.
Should I hold both IFGL and IVV?
IFGL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IFGL or IVV?
IFGL yields 3.98% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IFGL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than IFGL?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IFGL is less concentrated, with 28.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.